Tag Archives: target

Military Test Of Microwave Weapon Knocks Out Electronics

We’ve all been hearing stories of weapons that could send out an impulse or signal that would destroy electronic equipment without destroying buildings or injuring people (unless they are connected to electrically operated lifesaving equipment or have a pacemaker).  Once thought to be the subject of science fiction, they are in fact real and have been successfully tested.

The US Air Force Research Lab Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico along with Boeing, recently tested a weapon known as CHAMP (Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project.  They tested the missile over targets in the Utah Test and Training Range.
CHAMP emits bursts of high energy microwaves aimed at specific targets.  The test flight successfully knocked out the data and electronic systems at the target site.  Keith Coleman, Project Manager for Boeing Phantom Works commented about the test flight, saying:
“This technology marks a new era in modern-day warfare.  In the near future, this technology may be used to render an enemy’s electronic and data systems useless even before the first troops or aircraft arrive.”
While this new weapon can be very effective in knocking out an enemy’s electronics, rending most high tech weaponry inoperable, the technology also has some very questionable applications as well.  What if the government decided to use this weapon on areas here in the US that have high concentrations of conservatives or Christians?  They’ve already officially declared these groups to be potential terrorists, so why not knock out all of their electronics in their effort to combat us?
What if this technology got into the wrong hands?  What if someone decided to fly over New York City or Washington DC with a CHAMP style weapon?  It would cause economic panic and pandemonium.  Imagine Wall Street losing all of their electronic data along with all of the financial companies located in New York City?  Or what would happen if the Pentagon not only lost all of their power from such an attack but all of their electronic data as well?  National security would be threatened.  This technology could also shutdown airport control systems, leaving thousands of commercial flights without ground communications.
Like all weaponry, its intentions may be well and good, but the ramifications may be far more dangerous in the hands of the wrong people and our nation is full of the wrong people.  The next you experience a power outage, I bet you’ll wonder what the real cause is and if all of your electronic equipment will ever run again.

Did I touch a nerve IDS?

Oh, IDS is a charmer eh? This petulant, boastful piece of fantasy in the Guardian yesterday smacks of a spoilt child not quite getting exactly what he wants. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/28/proud-welfare-reforms-fair-benefits

Last week, I wrote my own piece for CiF asking why, when a system is failing as badly as Atos WCAs would you take that system and roll it out to millions of the most vulnerable sick and disabled people in the country before making sure that it was fair? 

What’s more, why would you constantly increase the rate of unfair assessments from around 25,000 a month initially to over 100,000 now? I hoped that these questions would cause a few awkward, anxious moments over at the DWP – after all, surely it must be someone’s job to keep an eye on what the country says about the God-fearing minister.

I noticed a little throw away line in IDS article from yesterday :

“Questions have been raised about whether the dramatic pace of our reforms is too difficult to implement.”

As far as I know, that was me asking those questions IDS. You know, and I know, that other contractors have been bought in to increase capacity, to cram even more of these vulnerable claimants through a test you know to be unfair – it has nothing to do with improving quality – only you can do that over at the DWP by changing the processes and descriptors.

You know, and I know, that the system is grinding to a halt with nearly half a million claimants waiting way longer in the “assessment phase” than the 13 week target.

You and I know that Atos have constantly increased the number of HCPs (assessors) they employ and asked them to work overtime and weekends trying to clear the backlogs.

And you and I know you cannot possibly hit your target of re-assessing the remaining million Incapacity Benefit claimants by May 2014.

So yes IDS, I raised those questions, but I don’t expect for one second to get an answer.

Thanks for responding to my article though, I must have really touched a nerve eh?